A foreman and coworkers drink after work; a coworker who is intoxicated backs his truck and injures himself while leaving. Is the injury compensable under California workers' compensation?

Prepare for the California Self‑Insurance Plans (SIP) Exam with our interactive quiz. Benefit from multiple-choice questions, detailed explanations, and essential tips to enhance your knowledge and succeed in your exam!

Multiple Choice

A foreman and coworkers drink after work; a coworker who is intoxicated backs his truck and injures himself while leaving. Is the injury compensable under California workers' compensation?

Explanation:
The key idea is that California workers’ compensation does not cover injuries that are caused by the employee’s own voluntary intoxication. If the intoxication is the reason the injury occurred, benefits are denied because the risk (drinking and driving after work) is personal, not a work-related hazard. In this scenario, the coworker was intoxicated from drinking after work and then injured himself while backing his truck as he was leaving. The injury stems from his own intoxication, not from a work-caused incident or a required job-related risk. Therefore, the claim is not compensable. Even if drinking were authorized by the foreman, that does not change the rule—the law bars compensation when the injury is caused by the employee’s intoxication. The compensable consequences rule doesn’t apply here because there isn’t a compensable work-related injury with subsequent compensable consequences.

The key idea is that California workers’ compensation does not cover injuries that are caused by the employee’s own voluntary intoxication. If the intoxication is the reason the injury occurred, benefits are denied because the risk (drinking and driving after work) is personal, not a work-related hazard.

In this scenario, the coworker was intoxicated from drinking after work and then injured himself while backing his truck as he was leaving. The injury stems from his own intoxication, not from a work-caused incident or a required job-related risk. Therefore, the claim is not compensable.

Even if drinking were authorized by the foreman, that does not change the rule—the law bars compensation when the injury is caused by the employee’s intoxication. The compensable consequences rule doesn’t apply here because there isn’t a compensable work-related injury with subsequent compensable consequences.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy