Under LC 3352, which scenario is explicitly excluded from being an employee due to the arrangement?

• A. A Full-Time Employee
• B. A Person Performing Officiating Services For Amateur Sports Who Receives No Remuneration Beyond Incidental Expenses
• C. A Paid Intern
• D. A Contractor From Another Company

Answer: (B)

Under LC 3352, a key distinction is made for volunteers—people who perform services without pay beyond incidental expenses are explicitly not considered employees. The scenario described fits a volunteer model: officiating amateur sports with no remuneration beyond incidental expenses. Because there is no wage, no ongoing employer-employee relationship, and the service is provided on a voluntary basis, this person is not an employee for purposes of the arrangement.

In contrast, a full‑time employee is by definition an employee, and a paid intern is typically treated as an employee for workers’ compensation purposes. A contractor from another company is generally regarded as an independent contractor, not an employee of the organization, which is a different classification. The explicit exclusion in LC 3352 specifically targets the volunteer arrangement, which is why this scenario is the best answer.