Which statement about suspension of physicians or practitioners is correct?

Unlock all questions

This demo includes only 20 questions. Upgrade to access hundreds of questions, flashcards, exam simulations, and disable ads.

Full question bankExam simulationsFlashcards
From $24.99Unlock all

Prepare for the California Self‑Insurance Plans (SIP) Exam with our interactive quiz. Benefit from multiple-choice questions, detailed explanations, and essential tips to enhance your knowledge and succeed in your exam!

Multiple Choice

Which statement about suspension of physicians or practitioners is correct?

Explanation:
In California workers’ compensation practice, suspension of a physician or practitioner for cause is controlled by a statute that explicitly grants the power to suspend or revoke a provider’s authorization based on misconduct or other serious issues, after due process. That statute is Labor Code section 139.21. It set up the authority to suspend for cause and outlines that process, including due notice and an opportunity for a hearing. The other listed sections do not establish the basis for suspending a physician or practitioner for cause, so they aren’t the correct source of authority in this context.

In California workers’ compensation practice, suspension of a physician or practitioner for cause is controlled by a statute that explicitly grants the power to suspend or revoke a provider’s authorization based on misconduct or other serious issues, after due process. That statute is Labor Code section 139.21. It set up the authority to suspend for cause and outlines that process, including due notice and an opportunity for a hearing. The other listed sections do not establish the basis for suspending a physician or practitioner for cause, so they aren’t the correct source of authority in this context.

More Multiple Choice Questions
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy